| From: | Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | How do you decide what aggregates to add? |
| Date: | 2017-10-20 14:11:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1508508674.1130504.1145432448.59069971@webmail.messagingengine.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
hi,
Who decides if a seemingly-useful aggregate is added to Postgres? I
would like to advocate for a couple, but I worry that I'm
misunderstanding some community process that has decided _not_ to add
aggregates or something.
1. I just discovered first()/last() as defined in the wiki [1], where
it's noted that conversion from Access or Oracle is much easier with
them.
2. We use our "homemade" jsonb_object_agg(jsonb) constantly, which is
modeled off of (built-in) json_object_agg(name, value) and (built-in)
jsonb_agg(expression). [2]
Since building these into Postgres (though not fast C versions) is a
matter of a dozen lines of SQL, why haven't they been added already?
Seems like a great thing to brag about in release notes, etc.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Seamus
[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/First/last_(aggregate)
[2] http://blog.faraday.io/how-to-aggregate-jsonb-in-postgres/
--
Seamus Abshere, SCEA
https://www.faraday.io
https://github.com/seamusabshere
https://linkedin.com/in/seamusabshere
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-20 14:38:31 | Re: How do you decide what aggregates to add? |
| Previous Message | Önder Kalacı | 2017-10-20 09:02:16 | A question on pg_stat_subscription view |