From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 |
Date: | 2004-08-03 23:52:49 |
Message-ID: | 15085.1091577169@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> One question did arise, however. In order to use pgxs I needed to do:
> make install-all-headers
> instead of:
> make install
> I seem to recall some discussion about this, but at the time didn't
> realize the impact. IMHO pgxs support (including all needed headers)
> should be installed by default, else we won't be able to count on it
> being there when needed. Any chance we can revisit this?
AFAICS the packagers (RPM etc) will continue to think that these files
belong in a postgresql-devel RPM, and will not include them in a base
package. I'm not sure of the point of trying to force installation in
a build from source given that much of the world isn't going to be using
a source package anyway.
However, we could certainly talk about altering the default behavior
(eg, install becomes install-no-headers and install-all-headers becomes
part of the default install target).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-03 23:56:36 | Preliminary PITR documentation available |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-03 22:58:06 | Re: compile warnings |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-04 02:05:47 | Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4 |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-03 22:58:06 | Re: compile warnings |