Re: The ..... worm

From: Francois Suter <dba(at)paragraf(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The ..... worm
Date: 2003-09-10 12:12:43
Message-ID: 15084DFC-E388-11D7-80BF-000393427520@paragraf.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Mark, would it cause anyone any great problems if posts gated onto the
> newsgroups had their email addresses removed, and would this be
> possible? I can't see that it would cause anybody any problems since
> casual readers could then still read/post to the group, and anyone
> involved with any of the postgresql lists long enough for this to be a
> problem would probably end up subscribing via email anyway. Anyone else
> have any feelings on this? I know it's too late for most of us but it
> might help some newbies...

I am not sure this is really going to help, because the e-mail
addresses are also harvested from the web-based archives. Still doesn't
such a reknowned ML tool as Majordomo have a feature that can hide
e-mail addresses (like automatically write them as someone AT any DOT
com) in the web archives?

Cheers.

---------------
Francois

Home page: http://www.monpetitcoin.com/

"Would Descartes have programmed in Pascal?" - Umberto Eco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-10 12:30:04 Re: The ..... worm
Previous Message Stéphane Cazeaux 2003-09-10 11:54:04 Re: Question about conccurrency control and Insert