Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: cherio(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
Date: 2020-10-04 17:36:29
Message-ID: 1508304.1601832989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 04:18:43PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> The following SQL worked in versions 9 through 12. It is throwing an error
>> in version 13.

> Uh, I am able to reproduce the error in PG _12_ as well, and I am sure
> it is related to this change in PG 12:

> Allow common table expressions (CTEs) to be inlined into the outer query
> (Andreas Karlsson, Andrew Gierth, David Fetter, Tom Lane)

Indeed. The planner now inlines the WITH query, allowing
"CAST(exp_days.days || ' days' AS interval)" to be folded to a constant,
whereupon you get an error since indeed ' days' isn't valid interval
input.

Sorry, I reject the position that this is a bug. It was something of
an implementation artifact that you didn't get this error before.
As of v12, we provide explicit control over whether a WITH query can
be inlined or not, and you need to use that control if you have a
query that's dependent on inlining not happening.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cherio 2020-10-04 22:19:40 Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-04 17:13:59 Re: BUG #16653: Regression in CTE evaluation