Re: postgis24_96 replaces postgis2_96, causing issues

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Jimmy Angelakos <jimmy(dot)angelakos(at)ed(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgis24_96 replaces postgis2_96, causing issues
Date: 2017-10-05 00:58:00
Message-ID: 1507165080.3791.63.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


Hi Jimmy,

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:44 +0100, Jimmy Angelakos wrote:
> Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by
> obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a
> postgis2_96-2.4.0 package.
>
> Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and
> postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that
> colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a
> postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace
> postgis2_96?

Unfortunately, we can't revert that change, because we already started
supporting more than 1 PostGIS version for many of PG releases :(

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2017-10-05 01:00:50 Re: RPMs for ppc64/ppc64le
Previous Message Jimmy Angelakos 2017-10-02 14:44:59 postgis24_96 replaces postgis2_96, causing issues