From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Date: | 2011-08-10 18:19:44 |
Message-ID: | 15045.1313000384@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I would like to see whether there is support for adding sha1 and sha2
> functions into the core.
I can't get excited about that, but could put up with it as long as
there wasn't scope creep ...
> One thing that might be reasonable would be to move the digest()
> functions
> digest(data text, type text) returns bytea
> digest(data bytea, type text) returns bytea
> from pgcrypto into core,
... which this approach would create, because digest() isn't restricted
to just those algorithms. I think it'd be better to just invent two
new functions, which also avoids issues for applications that currently
expect the digest functions to be installed in pgcrypto's schema.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-08-10 18:21:38 | Re: longstanding mingw warning |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-08-10 18:16:47 | Re: Enforcing that all WAL has been replayed after restoring from backup |