| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Last call for 7.3.2 |
| Date: | 2003-02-02 20:50:37 |
| Message-ID: | 15038.1044219037@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was thinking of that as a feature addition, but you still have time
>> to convince me it's a bug fix ...
> IMHO, it's a bugfix, or at least fixes a notable omission: the
> documented function of PQcmdTuples is that it "Returns the number of
> rows affected by the SQL command."
Yeah, but the next sentence makes it perfectly clear which commands the
function works for. Extending it to FETCH and MOVE is clearly a useful
extension ... but it's an extension.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-02-02 20:51:40 | Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it to |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-02 20:36:01 | Re: [PERFORM] not using index for select min(...) |