Re: PostgreSQL 13 RC 1 release announcement draft

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 13 RC 1 release announcement draft
Date: 2020-09-16 14:21:56
Message-ID: 1503376.1600266116@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> My inclination is to leave the statement alone or use that 2nd proposal
> I listed upthread.

I'd go with the simplest wording. As you say, people running betas
are probably sufficiently versed in what to do that they don't need
the release announcement to tell them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Brusselback 2020-09-16 14:23:22 Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-09-16 14:20:39 Re: Group by reordering optimization