Re: Why is parula failing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tharar(at)amazon(dot)com
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-03-21 01:19:44
Message-ID: 150311.1710983984@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> We could also do something like the attached just in case we're
> barking up the wrong tree.

Yeah, checking indisvalid isn't a bad idea. I'd put another
one further down, just before the DROP of table ab, so we
can see the state both before and after the unstable tests.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2024-03-21 02:30:43 Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-03-21 00:53:31 Re: Why is parula failing?