Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Date: 2004-01-07 04:43:37
Message-ID: 15028.1073450617@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Alex J. Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net> writes:
> I really think this is the wrong way to approach it. The 127.1
> convention is common, and valid.

AFAICS your own platform's C library doesn't support it, which means
you are on pretty shaky ground to make this claim.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Satrapa 2004-01-07 04:45:27 Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-07 04:38:44 Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf