Re: Order of operations in ascii vs archive format (moderately urgent)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order of operations in ascii vs archive format (moderately urgent)
Date: 2009-07-21 16:49:52
Message-ID: 15027.1248194992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a difference in the order of execution between an ascii dump
> and one using the "custom" format? Or any difference in the general
> operation?

There's not supposed to be. One standard test on the pg_dump code is
pg_dump >textfile
pg_dump -Fc >dumpfile
pg_restore dumpfile >textfile2
diff textfile textfile2
If these don't produce the same results something is broken.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2009-07-21 16:54:47 Re: Order of operations in ascii vs archive format (moderately urgent)
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2009-07-21 16:27:38 Order of operations in ascii vs archive format (moderately urgent)