| From: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im> |
| Subject: | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 12:07:09 |
| Message-ID: | 15016378.vyVp0UkF6a@nb.usersys.redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Monday 25 of January 2016 14:46:14 Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Pavel> there is no demand for that package in Linux
>
> Pease, read again:
> Vladimir>add one more build step: download relevant
> Vladimir>sources, build them
>
> Where do you see "adding new package" there?
Right, I missed that, sorry. But this requires new package -- it is new
upstream, new license -- I do not want to cross the border of
"good packagers group"..
pgjdbc-parent-poms are (probably) fine, because it is the same upstream as
pgjdbc, has the same license -- and to be honest, I guess those two git
repositories will be merged into one git and tarball in future anyway. If
not, pgjdbc main repo could be made self-standing sooner or later.
And similarly to osgi stuff, there is no demand for the separate package
existence.
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-25 12:09:45 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-25 12:02:26 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |