From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: VLDB Features |
Date: | 2007-12-14 23:22:41 |
Message-ID: | 15007.1197674561@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> By modifying COPY: COPY IGNORE ERRORS or some such would instruct COPY
> to drop (and log) rows that contain malformed data. That is, rows with
> too many or too few columns, rows that result in constraint violations,
> and rows containing columns where the data type's input function raises
> an error. The last case is the only thing that would be a bit tricky to
> implement, I think: you could use PG_TRY() around the InputFunctionCall,
> but I guess you'd need a subtransaction to ensure that you reset your
> state correctly after catching an error.
Yeah. It's the subtransaction per row that's daunting --- not only the
cycles spent for that, but the ensuing limitation to 4G rows imported
per COPY.
If we could somehow only do a subtransaction per failure, things would
be much better, but I don't see how.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-14 23:42:24 | Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-14 19:39:49 | Re: VLDB Features |