Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kristofer Munn <kmunn(at)munn(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak
Date: 2000-01-17 05:01:27
Message-ID: 15003.948085287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kristofer Munn <kmunn(at)munn(dot)com> writes:
> I've created a sample case that reproduces the error that I will attach
> with this message. Basically, I create a 50 column temp table (with no
> rows in it) and then run updates on each column in succession. The
> backend gets large pretty quick - I'm seeing about 12Megs after running
> the enclosed script which does an update on all 50 columns 3 times (150
> updates).

I confirm the leak in 6.5.* --- but I see no leak in current sources.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-17 05:04:39 Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak
Previous Message Kristofer Munn 2000-01-17 04:40:44 Temp Table Memory Leak