Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort

James and Tomas,

On 1/21/20 10:03 AM, James Coleman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:58 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:37:01AM -0500, James Coleman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:25 AM Tomas Vondra
>>> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch has been marked as WoA since end of November, and there has
>>>> been no discussion/reviews since then :-( Based on off-list discussion
>>>> with James I don't think that's going to change in this CF, so I'll move
>>>> it to the next CF.
>>>>
>>>> I plan to work on the planner part of this patch before 2020-03, with
>>>> the hope it can still make it into 13.
>>>
>>> In that off-list discussion I'd mentioned to Tomas that I would still
>>> like to work on this, just my other responsibilities at work have left
>>> me little time to work on the most important remaining part of this
>>> (the planner parts) since that requires a fair amount of focus and
>>> time.
>>>
>>> That being said, the patch also needs some more work on improving
>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (perhaps min/max/mean or median of
>>> memory usage number of groups in each sort mode), and I think it's far
>>> more feasible that I can tackle that piecemeal before the next CF.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, sorry if that was not clear from my message - you're of course
>> more than welcome to continue working on this. My understanding is that
>> won't happen by the end of this CF, hence the move to 2020-03.
>
> Oh, yeah, I probably didn't word that reply well -- I just wanted to
> add some additional detail to what you had already said.
>
> Thanks for your work on this!

It doesn't look there has been much movement on this patch for the last
few CFs. Are one or both of you planning to work on this for v13? Or
should we mark it for v14 and/or move it to the next CF.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net