From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Read only user permission |
Date: | 2023-08-24 02:12:34 |
Message-ID: | 14f02a5e-4f6d-70a2-3cfb-fb783748c64a@gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/23/23 13:23, Hellen Jiang wrote:
>
> Sorry it is a typo in the email. My readonly role is dbreadonly. It
> works well so far except no access to new tables created by read write
> role. It has access to new tables created by admin role.
>
> I granted dbreadonly as the following:
>
> -- Read-only role
> GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE mydatabase TO dbreadonly;
> GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO dbreadonly;
> GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO dbreadonly;
> GRANT SELECT ON ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA public TO dbreadonly;
> ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA public GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO
> dbreadonly;
>
Is "public" a good schema to use for this sort of thing, or does it matter?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tushar Takate | 2023-08-24 05:38:39 | Re: PostgreSQL DB cluster migration from centos7/RHEL7/OEL7 to RHEL8 |
Previous Message | Hellen Jiang | 2023-08-23 19:23:34 | Re: Read only user permission |