| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
| Date: | 2022-03-28 18:42:42 |
| Message-ID: | 14B6A53F-B155-4C98-A083-FC5005589825@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 28, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I think we probably have to trash the core-regression-tests part of
> the patch altogether and instead use a TAP test for whatever testing
> we want to do. It might be all right to test SET privileges without
> testing ALTER SYSTEM, but I'm not sure there's much point in that.
How about putting them under src/test/modules/unsafe_tests ?
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2022-03-28 18:55:01 | Re: Patch: Code comments: why some text-handling functions are leakproof |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2022-03-28 18:38:25 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |