From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "aarjan langereis" <a(dot)j(dot)langereis(at)chello(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1015: Got a signal 11 while trying to create a temp table |
Date: | 2003-12-24 15:15:16 |
Message-ID: | 14995.1072278916@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"aarjan langereis" <a(dot)j(dot)langereis(at)chello(dot)nl> writes:
> I reproduced the crash and got a good core-file (with the symbols, see
> below). The only thing is: it's 390Mb :( .. even after gzip it's big: 250Mb.
> Would that be a problem for you? (I have the bandwith if you want)
No point in sending it to me, it's of no value on a different machine
(because the executable files are usually not identical).
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0819b684 in LogicalTapeWrite ()
> #1 0x0819da13 in ApplySortFunction ()
> #2 0x0819cf10 in tuplesort_getdatum ()
> #3 0x080ea656 in ExecSort ()
Hm. I'm afraid gdb is lying to you, because this stack trace is
impossible -- those functions don't call each other. I have seen
that happen when the compiler optimization level is too high; gdb's
stack tracing code gets confused. To get any useful information,
you'll need to rebuild with debug symbols enabled (--enable-debug
switch to configure).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-12-24 15:59:19 | Re: [JDBC] BUG #1026: org.apache.commons.dbcp.DbcpException: |
Previous Message | Tammy Jones | 2003-12-24 14:32:10 | Re: [JDBC] BUG #1026: org.apache.commons.dbcp.DbcpException: |