| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "aarjan langereis" <a(dot)j(dot)langereis(at)chello(dot)nl> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1015: Got a signal 11 while trying to create a temp table | 
| Date: | 2003-12-24 15:15:16 | 
| Message-ID: | 14995.1072278916@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
"aarjan langereis" <a(dot)j(dot)langereis(at)chello(dot)nl> writes:
> I reproduced the crash and got a good core-file (with the symbols, see
> below). The only thing is: it's 390Mb :( .. even after gzip it's big: 250Mb.
> Would that be a problem for you? (I have the bandwith if you want)
No point in sending it to me, it's of no value on a different machine
(because the executable files are usually not identical).
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x0819b684 in LogicalTapeWrite ()
> #1  0x0819da13 in ApplySortFunction ()
> #2  0x0819cf10 in tuplesort_getdatum ()
> #3  0x080ea656 in ExecSort ()
Hm.  I'm afraid gdb is lying to you, because this stack trace is
impossible -- those functions don't call each other.  I have seen
that happen when the compiler optimization level is too high; gdb's
stack tracing code gets confused.  To get any useful information,
you'll need to rebuild with debug symbols enabled (--enable-debug
switch to configure).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-12-24 15:59:19 | Re: [JDBC] BUG #1026: org.apache.commons.dbcp.DbcpException: | 
| Previous Message | Tammy Jones | 2003-12-24 14:32:10 | Re: [JDBC] BUG #1026: org.apache.commons.dbcp.DbcpException: |