Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-06-23 16:02:43
Message-ID: 14982.1182614563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> One thing I've thought about doing is to remove the default in initdb
>> completely and *force* the user to choose auth type. Packagers can
>> then just use that to set ident or whatever. and interactive users
>> can pick trust if they really need it, but it will be a known choice.

> Since nobody comemnted on this, let me turn it around and ask: Does
> anybody have any reason *not* to do this?

I'll object if no one else does: this will break existing installation
habits and processes to no real benefit.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2007-06-23 16:04:38 Re: tsearch in core patch
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-06-23 12:43:27 Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL