Re: Join Table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mailreg(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de
Cc: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Join Table
Date: 2004-11-01 17:07:38
Message-ID: 14976.1099328858@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

T E Schmitz <mailreg(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de> writes:
> CREATE TABLE SUPPLY
> (
> ITEM_FK integer NOT NULL,
> CONTACT_FK integer NOT NULL,
> COST numeric (7,2),
> PRIMARY KEY (ITEM_FK,CONTACT_FK)
> );

> Question: is it necessary/advisable to create an index for the ITEM_FK
> column? Or is this redundantbecause this column is already one of the PK
> columns?

The PK index will be usable for searches on ITEM_FK alone (though *not*
for searches on CONTACT_FK alone --- a moment's thought about the index
sort order should convince you why). It would be marginally less
efficient for this purpose than a dedicated index on ITEM_FK. But unless
your use of this table is almost all searches and hardly any
modifications, adding a dedicated index is probably a net loss due to
the added update costs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Join Table at 2004-11-01 16:34:32 from T E Schmitz

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-11-01 17:08:51 Re: Join Table
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2004-11-01 17:03:24 Re: Join Table