| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
| Date: | 2003-09-04 18:17:43 |
| Message-ID: | 14962.1062699463@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> To what purpose? I think I prefer Andrew Dunstan's approach of allowing
>> IPv4 syntax in pg_hba.conf to match appropriate IPv6 connections.
> I am confused. Andrew Dunstan's approach added a new 'loopback' line
> to pg_hba.conf.
> Andreas Pflug had the patch that treated IPv4 as IPv6.
Ah, my mistake. The patch from Andreas seems like a reasonable thing to
me.
I'm of two minds about 'loopback' --- it's perhaps logically cleaner
than referring to 127.0.0.1, but do we want another special case?
Also, do we really need it if we add Andreas' patch?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-09-04 18:20:53 | Re: Win32 native port |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-04 18:13:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port |