| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs |
| Date: | 2001-04-14 18:20:42 |
| Message-ID: | 14960.987272442@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
> Win camp could be seperated also ...
> pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
A windows list seems like a good idea. But I'm not sure that a separate
list for RPMs is a good idea. In the first place, it's fuzzy: is it
to be used just for RPM packaging discussion, or is it going to draw
off --- for example --- all bug reports from people who happen to have
installed from RPM instead of source? I suppose the former is intended,
but it's not going to be clear to people. I think we've already got too
many lists with fuzzy boundaries. In the second place, the RPM
packaging discussion is quite sporadic; I think the traffic would be nil
except at times when Lamar is working on new RPMs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-04-14 18:28:11 | Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-04-14 18:18:43 | Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs |