| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: followup on previous |
| Date: | 2003-07-31 18:38:58 |
| Message-ID: | 14946.1059676738@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Putting on marketing hat:
> While branding is important, unlike other projects the shortened version of
> our name is still distinctive and unique ... "Postgres" is unlikely to be
> mistaken for anything else.
Also, we should continue to use it reasonably frequently to help keep
newbies from falling into the supposition that the shortened version
is "Postgre" ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ivan | 2003-07-31 20:21:22 | Re: now about psql and one function |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-07-31 18:31:38 | Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like |