| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, girgen(at)FreeBSD(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More buildfarm stuff |
| Date: | 2005-07-24 22:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 14945.1122244835@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> We don't seem to have made any progress on this. Is there someone else
> who has a machine with these specs that they can test this for us?
> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p10
> gcc 2.95.4
> x86 SMP
I think someone mentioned this already, but it'd be a good idea to
compare the python situation to plperl. On my Linux box, libperl.so
shows several references to pthread_xxx symbols ... not the same ones
libpython.so depends on, but pthread symbols none the less. I'd kind
of expect them both to fail if the problem is that the stock libc
doesn't include pthreads.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2005-07-24 22:52:23 | Re: More buildfarm stuff |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-24 22:33:28 | Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch |