From: | Neil Anderson <neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma |
Date: | 2018-02-15 18:55:08 |
Message-ID: | 14943ebd-1042-f331-2589-f1690a0786f4@postgrescompare.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2018-02-15 1:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?PG_Doc_comments_form?= <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> See the example from the documentation for CREATE TABLE below. There should
>> be a comma before the CONSTRAINT keyword.
>
>> CREATE TABLE distributors (
>> did integer,
>> name varchar(40)
>> CONSTRAINT con1 CHECK (did > 100 AND name <> '')
>> );
>
> Hmm ... that example is legal syntax as-is, but considering that the
> explanation for it says specifically that it's table-constraint syntax
> not column-constraint syntax, I think you're right.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Oh yeah! You're right, strictly speaking it does work. I guess I read it
as a table constraint because it's on the next line.
--
Neil Anderson
neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com
http://www.postgrescompare.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
neil.vcf | text/x-vcard | 165 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-02-15 23:06:27 | i think there's a typo |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-15 18:47:39 | Re: The example for creating a check constraint is missing a comma |