| From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CTE inlining |
| Date: | 2017-05-02 16:01:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1493740874227-5959313.post@n3.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Relevant posts where users get confused by our behaviour:
> ....
And Markus Winand's blog: http://modern-sql.com/feature/with/performance
Databases generally obey this principle, although PostgreSQL represents
a big exception
and
Besides PostgreSQL, all tested databases optimize with clauses in the
same way
that they optimize views or derived tables"
--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/CTE-inlining-tp5958992p5959313.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rahila Syed | 2017-05-02 16:03:03 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-02 16:00:06 | Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling) |