| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files) |
| Date: | 2011-03-10 15:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 14928.1299772795@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Speaking of running scripts, I think we should run pgindent now.
> Yeah, +1 for doing it as soon as Tom is at a good stopping point. It
> makes things a lot simpler later on.
IIRC the argument for an early pgindent run was to standardize the new
code for easier review. I expect to be spending a whole lot of time
reading collate and SSI code over the next few weeks, so I'm in favor
of pgindent'ing that stuff first. But I guess we need the typedef
list update before anything can happen.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-03-10 16:05:19 | Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-03-10 15:57:53 | Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files) |