Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	"Oliver Siegmar" <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>
Cc:	pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Date:	2005-04-20 15:57:37
Message-ID:	1492.1114012657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-04-20 15:04:32 from "Oliver Siegmar" <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>  2005-04-20 15:57:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2005-04-20 16:07:16 from Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>    2005-04-20 16:10:45 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2005-04-20 17:15:59 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-bugs

In response to

• BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps at 2005-04-20 15:04:32 from Oliver Siegmar

Responses

• Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps at 2005-04-20 16:07:16 from Oliver Siegmar

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Oliver Siegmar	2005-04-20 16:07:16	Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2005-04-20 15:10:13	Re: BUG #1608: integer negative limit in plpgsql function arguments