Re: pg_dump roles support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump roles support
Date: 2007-12-10 16:27:55
Message-ID: 14915.1197304075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Seems like the correct answer to that is "use a saner role
>> configuration".

> Far as I can tell anyway. What would you suggest? The point here is
> that joesysadmin shouldn't get full postgres privs on login since most
> of the time he won't need them.

It's sane to set up a manually-used admin account that way, I agree.
What doesn't follow is that an account configured for manual use should
be used for non-interactive stuff like pg_dump.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2007-12-10 16:39:36 Re: pg_dump roles support
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2007-12-10 16:23:22 Re: Problem of a server gettext message.