Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.

From: rverghese <riyav(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.
Date: 2017-04-06 01:10:56
Message-ID: 1491441056780-5954521.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Yup, I just found the per index option. Pretty cool. Will see what value is
optimal...

Thanks
RV

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Table-not-using-tsvector-gin-index-and-performance-much-worse-than-when-it-uses-it-tp5954485p5954521.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dinesh Chandra 12108 2017-04-07 14:13:58 Filter certain range of IP address.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-06 01:08:25 Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.