Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it.

Thanks for the response!

* We are on version 9.5.6

* Less than 10% of the table was updated today (between the time of the last
reindex to when performance deteriorated)

* autovacuum is on. I don't see an autoanalyze property in config but these
are the settings for analyze
/autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 3000 # min number of row updates before
analyze
#autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2 # fraction of table size before
vacuum
#autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1 # fraction of table size before
analyze
#autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 200000000 # maximum XID age before forced
vacuum
# (change requires restart)/

* And this #gin_pending_list_limit = 4MB

* gin_clean_pending_list() is not available.

Will play with gin_pending_list_limit and see what that does.

Thanks!
RV

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Table-not-using-tsvector-gin-index-and-performance-much-worse-than-when-it-uses-it-tp5954485p5954503.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.