Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is no normal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is no normal
Date: 2019-05-14 14:25:50
Message-ID: 14904.1557843950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-05-14 12:37:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Still, I would like to understand why the bootstrap process has been
>> signaled to begin with, particularly for an initdb, which is not
>> really something that should happen on a server where an instance
>> runs. If you have a too aggressive monitoring job, you may want to
>> revisit that as well, because it is able to complain just with an
>> initdb.

> Shutdown, timeout, resource exhaustion all seem like possible
> causes. Don't think any of them warrant a core file - as the OP
> explains, that'll often trigger pages etc.

Yeah. The case I was thinking about was mostly "start initdb,
decide I didn't want to do that, hit control-C". That cleans up
without much fuss *except* if you manage to hit the window
where it's running bootstrap, and then it spews this scary-looking
error. It's less scary-looking with the SIG_DFL patch, which
I've now pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2019-05-14 14:31:40 Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing?
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2019-05-14 14:11:39 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join