From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Date: | 2017-07-25 15:39:35 |
Message-ID: | 148f10a8-8aed-1a09-cb00-1d871612dadf@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/25/2017 11:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
>>> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS. Yes, this sounds
>>> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>>>
>>> It would be useful to see the results of
>>> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>>> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
>>> field(s).
>> Why ccopts rather than ccflags?
> I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing.
> Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts.
>
>
per docs:
ccopts()
This function combines "perl_inc()", "ccflags()" and
"ccdlflags()"
into one.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-07-25 16:09:36 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-25 15:39:33 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |