From: | twoflower <standa(dot)kurik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Huge difference between ASC and DESC ordering |
Date: | 2017-03-06 14:22:26 |
Message-ID: | 1488810146219-5947712.post@n3.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I have the following query
which takes 90 seconds to finish. *JOB_MEMORY* has 45 million rows,
*JOB_MEMORY_STORAGE* has 50 000 rows.
Query plan:
As you can see, it is indeed using an index *JOB_MEMORY_id_desc* in a
backward direction, but it is very slow.
When I change ordering to *desc* in the query, the query finishes
immediately and the query plan is
There is also an index on *JOB_MEMORY.id*. I also tried a composite index on
*(fk_id_storage, id)*, but it did not help (and was not actually used).
I ran *ANALYZE* on both tables.
Postgres 9.6.2, Ubuntu 14.04, 192 GB RAM, SSD, shared_buffers = 8196 MB.
How can I help Postgres execute the query with *asc* ordering as fast as the
one with *desc*?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Huge-difference-between-ASC-and-DESC-ordering-tp5947712.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-03-06 16:19:31 | Re: Huge difference between ASC and DESC ordering |
Previous Message | Piotr Gasidło | 2017-03-06 13:20:42 | Performance issue after upgrading from 9.4 to 9.6 |