From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS |
Date: | 2015-09-21 02:21:16 |
Message-ID: | 14863.1442802076@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> * Joe Conway (mail(at)joeconway(dot)com) wrote:
>>> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we
>>> also need #3.
>> Agreed on all of the above.
> Well, then, we should get cracking. beta1 is coming soon, and it
> would be best if this were done before then.
I'd say it's *necessary*. We're not adding new features after beta1.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2015-09-21 04:52:09 | Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-21 02:19:04 | Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS |