Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.

From: "Thomas Swan" <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Date: 2004-03-12 16:43:34
Message-ID: 14858.199.222.14.2.1079109814.squirrel@www.idigx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

<quote who="Tom Lane">
> My feeling is that we want people to consider these projects as closely
> tied to the Postgres community and so postgresql.something is just right.
> I can see there are different opinions out there though...
>

foundry.postgresql.org?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-03-12 16:52:23 Re: PITR Functional Design v2 for 7.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-12 16:23:14 Re: Performance and WAL on big inserts/updates

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-03-12 16:52:55 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-03-12 15:56:40 Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org