Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Date: 2004-05-07 18:44:01
Message-ID: 14858.1083955441@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> Sorry, I see that's *6B* per, so setting it to 3M ==> 18MB, which is trivial
> for the benefit. Any other concerns in setting this too high?

Not that I know of.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2004-05-07 18:47:02 Re: any experience with multithreaded pg apps?
Previous Message Ed L. 2004-05-07 18:29:01 Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity