Re: pgindent run next week?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgindent run next week?
Date: 2019-05-17 21:49:43
Message-ID: 14853.1558129783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On May 17, 2019, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Anybody around here got large patches they're carrying against
>> back branches, that they could try reapplying after running
>> a newer version of pgindent?

> I have forks of 9.1 and 9.5 that each amount to large changes
> against the public sources, though I consider those forks to be
> defunct. If you want me to run some particular version of pg_indent
> against the public sources of 9.1 and 9.5 and then try to merge the
> changed sources into my forks, I could give it a try. I'm not
> sure if this is the sort of thing you have in mind....

9.1 is probably too far back to be interesting, but it'd be good
to try the experiment with your 9.5 fork.

Assuming you only want to do this once, I'd suggest waiting till
I push the function-prototype changes to the pg_bsd_indent repo,
and then use that along with the latest pgindent.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-05-17 21:54:50 Re: Create TOAST table only if AM needs
Previous Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-05-17 21:49:19 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take