Re: Bad row estimates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Alex Adriaanse <alex(at)innovacomputing(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad row estimates
Date: 2006-03-04 16:09:59
Message-ID: 14850.1141488599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> (I don't think the end_ts in the index is buying you much, despite its
> appearance in the Index Cond in the plan.)

Well, it saves some trips to the heap, but the indexscan is still going
to run from the beginning of the index to start_ts = now(), because
btree has no idea that there's any correlation between the two index
columns.

If you could put some a-priori bound on the interval width, you could
add a WHERE constraint "AND now() - max_width <= start_ts", which'd
constrain the index scan and possibly also get you a better planner
estimate. Otherwise I think you really need a special datatype for time
intervals and a GIST or r-tree index on it :-(.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-03-04 18:11:13 Re: Bad row estimates
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-04 15:46:05 Re: Bad row estimates