Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Date: 2022-04-14 15:46:46
Message-ID: 1484483.1649951206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think you're trying to shoot the messenger. As Andres says,
>> 277692220 just exposes that there is some pre-existing bug here.
>> It's probably related to 84f5c2908, so I was planning to take a
>> look at it at some point, but there are a few other higher-priority
>> bugs in the way.

> Well, if you're willing to look at it that's fine, but I just don't
> agree that it's OK to just commit things that add failing assertions
> and drive off into the sunset.

I don't think Andres had any intention of ignoring it indefinitely.
What he is doing is prioritizing it lower than several of the other
open items, an opinion I fully agree with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-14 16:01:23 Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-14 15:41:13 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)