Re: Check-out mutable functions in check constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Check-out mutable functions in check constraints
Date: 2019-07-12 23:59:13
Message-ID: 14835.1562975953@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> Mutable function are allowed in check constraint expressions but
>>> it is not right. The attached is a proposed fix for it including
>>> regression test.

> Yes, and the question is whether this is the right thing to do (I think
> it probably is).

I'm pretty sure this change has been proposed before, and rejected before.
Has anybody excavated in the archives for prior discussions?

> OTOH, even if we prohibit mutable functions in check constraints, people
> can still create triggers doing those checks (and shoot themselves in
> the foot that way).

There are, and always will be, lots of ways to shoot yourself in the foot.
In the case at hand, I fear we might just encourage people to mark
functions as immutable when they really aren't --- which will make their
problems *worse* not better, because now other uses besides check
constraints will also be at risk of misoptimization.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-07-13 00:11:37 Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in mcv_get_match_bitmap
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-07-12 23:26:51 Re: Check-out mutable functions in check constraints