| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_xlogdump |
| Date: | 2013-02-24 14:34:31 |
| Message-ID: | 14820.1361716471@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-02-23 14:54:51 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> I don't know if the Makefile needs to be taught not to delete it, or taught
>> how to recreate it once deleted.
> It shouldn't be deleted,
I came to the same conclusion and committed that a few minutes before
you posted.
> I independently wonder whether we should remove the PGXS stub from
> xlogdump, given it relies on a full sourcetree available?
I'd just as soon keep its Makefile looking like all the others.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-02-24 15:14:41 | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-02-24 14:08:34 | Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) |