Re: Permance issues with migrated db

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Fitzpatrick <lists(at)webtent(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Permance issues with migrated db
Date: 2007-05-22 17:10:43
Message-ID: 14820.1179853843@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Robert Fitzpatrick <lists(at)webtent(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:21 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Your query seems to produce 41.8 million rows. Are you sure MS-SQL is
>> returning that many rows in a few seconds?

> I thought the same thing. While I'm not a MS SQL guru, I put 'TOP 100
> PERCENT' after SELECT in the query. The Enterprise Manager does not
> indicate how many rows come back. I save it as a VIEW in MS SQL and do a
> 'select count(*)...' and, yes, it comes back 42164877 records.

> Just to be sure MS SQL hasn't done something to the structure (I noticed
> dbo prefixes, etc.), I pasted back into pgadmin, took off 'top 100
> percent'. Then saved as a view and did a count(*) in pgsql, got
> 41866801.

How much time do the two select count(*) operations take? That would be
a reasonably fair comparison of the query engines, as opposed to
whatever might be happening on the client side (in particular, I wonder
whether the MS client is actually fetching all the rows or just the
first few).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Fitzpatrick 2007-05-22 17:15:56 Re: Permance issues with migrated db
Previous Message jws 2007-05-22 17:08:24 Rounding datetimes