Re: SQL/JSON features for v15

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Date: 2022-08-31 17:14:56
Message-ID: 14814.1661966096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (I don't say that we'd convert every datatype to do so right away;
>> in the long run we should, but I'm content to start with just the
>> same core types touched here.)

> I would be in favor of making more of an effort than just a few token
> data types. The initial patch could just touch a few, but once the
> infrastructure is in place we should really make a sweep through the
> tree and tidy up.

Sure, but my point is that we can do that in a time-extended fashion
rather than having a flag day where everything must be updated.
The initial patch just needs to update a few types as proof of concept.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-08-31 17:33:53 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-08-31 17:09:51 Re: SQL/JSON features for v15