Re: appendStringInfoString() micro-opt

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: appendStringInfoString() micro-opt
Date: 2004-01-26 20:28:31
Message-ID: 14813.1075148911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not objecting to your doing it, exactly, just suggesting that there
>> are better things to spend your time on.

> Of course, if it makes the code clearer, that is a win in itself.

Sure, but I can't see that there's any gain in readability here ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-01-26 22:14:30 Re: Clarify libpq docs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-26 19:56:40 Re: appendStringInfoString() micro-opt