Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?

From: Mark Anns <aishwaryaanns(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Date: 2016-11-18 06:29:45
Message-ID: 1479450585740-5930903.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"fraction of the cost of executing the same portion of the plan using
the traditional CPU processing"

Can u explain about this fraction in detail?

I need the clarifications for query plan tree also.

Executing a query in CPU is different from executing the same in GPU. So the
plan also differs. How it differs?

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/How-the-Planner-in-PGStrom-differs-from-PostgreSQL-tp5929724p5930903.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artur Zakirov 2016-11-18 09:07:25 Re: Full text search tsv column aproach vs concat confusion
Previous Message Andreas Terrius 2016-11-18 06:13:39 Partial update on an postgres upsert violates constraint