Re: Simpler dump?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simpler dump?
Date: 2007-12-10 16:22:18
Message-ID: 14776.1197303738@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com> writes:
> OK, Now I am a bit confused. The manual doesn't say
> what to do if you don't see template1 or template0 on
> the server, or even whether or not you should be able
> to see them when using a tool like pgAdmin.

Our manual is not in charge of documenting pgAdmin.

Perhaps you should go to the pgadmin lists and discuss
with them whether auto-hiding these databases is such
a good idea.

Or at least dare to touch "psql -l" so that you can find out
whether pgAdmin is hiding them or not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Burger 2007-12-10 16:22:37 Re: Planner not using UNIQUEness of index properly
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-12-10 16:13:37 Re: Planner not using UNIQUEness of index properly