Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?
Date: 2010-01-08 22:38:22
Message-ID: 14771.1262990302@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> The other issue was with a Debian-specific patch which was applied to
> OpenSSH which basically just created noise in the log file, bug report
> here:

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487325

Hmm, that's pretty interesting, specifically this:

: After some discussion with the Linux-Vserver folks, they found some
: interesting information I thought it worth adding. First EPERM is not
: the error that they expected, and that inside a vserver guest its really
: strict about what options you open it with, both O_CREAT and O_TRUNC are
: forbidden, and O_WRONLY lets you write 0\n to it.

That suggests it might be worth our trouble to use open/write rather
than fopen, so that we can ensure the flags are correct to avoid this
type of restriction.

But in any case the main takeaway seems to be to not insist on the
operation succeeding ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-08 23:07:14 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-01-08 22:24:06 Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?