Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-18 22:50:48
Message-ID: 14770.995496648@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Maybe ctid needs to be documented better?

I think it's documented about as well as OID is, actually --- see

http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/sql-syntax-columns.html

which AFAIR is the only formal documentation of any of the system
columns.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2001-07-18 23:02:45 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-18 22:41:16 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)