| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing |
| Date: | 2008-09-07 16:19:08 |
| Message-ID: | 14765.1220804348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 11:01 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Hasn't integer-datetimes been the default for a while?
> No. I added it as a macro to 8.3, but did not enable it by default,
> because I am trying to be binary compatible with Red Hat / Fedora RPMs.
> I believe Tom will also add it to 8.4 packages for Fedora 11.
The RHEL/Fedora RPMs have never specified this one way or the other,
so they'd just get the default. I haven't really thought about whether
to change that when 8.4 comes out. I'd prefer to follow upstream's
lead on the point; but if for instance we could do update-in-place
so long as you hadn't switched datetime representation, that would be a
pretty powerful incentive to stick with the float format.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-09-07 17:39:01 | Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-09-07 16:18:11 | Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-09-07 17:39:01 | Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-09-07 16:18:11 | Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing |